<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 56 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775869</link>
    <description>Proceedings initiated against a deceased person after their death cannot be continued against their legal representatives under Section 159. If proceedings had begun during the assessee&#039;s lifetime, continuation against legal representatives would be permissible. Since the proceedings in this case were initiated posthumously, they are invalid. The HC upheld the quashing of such proceedings and set aside the order against the deceased person.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:15:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 56 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775869</link>
      <description>Proceedings initiated against a deceased person after their death cannot be continued against their legal representatives under Section 159. If proceedings had begun during the assessee&#039;s lifetime, continuation against legal representatives would be permissible. Since the proceedings in this case were initiated posthumously, they are invalid. The HC upheld the quashing of such proceedings and set aside the order against the deceased person.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>