<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 63 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775876</link>
    <description>An appellate order on a refund claim is vulnerable where the authority considers only one ground and ignores the other substantive grounds raised in the appeal memo. Failure to advert to and evaluate all material grounds shows non-application of mind and improper examination of the appeal. The High Court therefore set aside the impugned appellate order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:15:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 63 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775876</link>
      <description>An appellate order on a refund claim is vulnerable where the authority considers only one ground and ignores the other substantive grounds raised in the appeal memo. Failure to advert to and evaluate all material grounds shows non-application of mind and improper examination of the appeal. The High Court therefore set aside the impugned appellate order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>