<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 65 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775878</link>
    <description>A statutory GST appeal should not be dismissed solely for non-submission of a self-certified copy of the impugned order where the defect is curable and no distinguishing reason justifies a stricter approach. The Court treated the omission as remediable, rejected the limitation objection in the facts, set aside the dismissal, and directed restoration of the appeal after filing the copy within fifteen days for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:15:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 65 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775878</link>
      <description>A statutory GST appeal should not be dismissed solely for non-submission of a self-certified copy of the impugned order where the defect is curable and no distinguishing reason justifies a stricter approach. The Court treated the omission as remediable, rejected the limitation objection in the facts, set aside the dismissal, and directed restoration of the appeal after filing the copy within fifteen days for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>