https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775880 The HC held that issuance of multiple SCNs on the same subject and period by different authorities leads to multiplicity of proceedings and harassment. Since a stay was granted by the Karnataka HC on the SCN issued by DGGI covering the all-India jurisdiction including the Goa branch, the respondent should have refrained from adjudicating the matter. The respondent's order confirming GST demand was set aside as it conflicted with the stay and principles established in Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. The HC directed that the proceedings before respondent no. 1 be kept in abeyance and allowed the petition, preventing duplication of adjudication on the same issue. en-us Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:15:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775880 The HC held that issuance of multiple SCNs on the same subject and period by different authorities leads to multiplicity of proceedings and harassment. Since a stay was granted by the Karnataka HC on the SCN issued by DGGI covering the all-India jurisdiction including the Goa branch, the respondent should have refrained from adjudicating the matter. The respondent's order confirming GST demand was set aside as it conflicted with the stay and principles established in Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. The HC directed that the proceedings before respondent no. 1 be kept in abeyance and allowed the petition, preventing duplication of adjudication on the same issue. Case-Laws GST Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775880