<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 86 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45476</link>
    <description>SC held that turbo alternators erected on a site constitute immovable property and are not excisable goods under Heading 85.02. The Court found the Tribunal erred in treating the installed unit as a marketable, permanent manufactured good: removal requires separation into turbine and alternator, and a concrete platform on land does not amount to a common base joining the machines into one unit. The Tribunal&#039;s conclusion was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 20:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 86 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45476</link>
      <description>SC held that turbo alternators erected on a site constitute immovable property and are not excisable goods under Heading 85.02. The Court found the Tribunal erred in treating the installed unit as a marketable, permanent manufactured good: removal requires separation into turbine and alternator, and a concrete platform on land does not amount to a common base joining the machines into one unit. The Tribunal&#039;s conclusion was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>