<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 76 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45474</link>
    <description>Rule 57A allowed Modvat credit for inputs used not only directly in manufacture but also in relation to manufacture, and the phrase &quot;in relation to&quot; was read broadly. The explanation to the rule was treated as an inclusive definition of inputs, so items used as aids in the manufacturing process could qualify if they were not covered by the specific exclusions in the proviso. On that basis, ramming mass, fibre glass filter mesh and similar items used in producing pistons were held eligible for Modvat credit, and the narrower view that only raw materials or components qualified was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:10:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 76 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45474</link>
      <description>Rule 57A allowed Modvat credit for inputs used not only directly in manufacture but also in relation to manufacture, and the phrase &quot;in relation to&quot; was read broadly. The explanation to the rule was treated as an inclusive definition of inputs, so items used as aids in the manufacturing process could qualify if they were not covered by the specific exclusions in the proviso. On that basis, ramming mass, fibre glass filter mesh and similar items used in producing pistons were held eligible for Modvat credit, and the narrower view that only raw materials or components qualified was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>