<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>IGST and penalty upheld for goods detained due to missing Part B of E-way bill under Rule 138 MPGST</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91100</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the levy of IGST and penalty for detention of goods due to non-generation of Part B of the E-way bill, despite the consignment being accompanied by a tax invoice with a Letter of Undertaking number, consignment note, and letter of credit. The court affirmed that under Rule 138 of the MPGST Rules, both Part A and Part B of FORM GST EWB-01 must be generated electronically before the movement of goods exceeding Rs. 50,000 in value. The absence of Part B invalidated the E-way bill, rendering the transportation unauthorized. The court held that generation of Part B is a mandatory statutory requirement to validate the movement, especially for export consignments. Consequently, the impugned order imposing tax and penalty was found proper, and the petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:18:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:18:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>IGST and penalty upheld for goods detained due to missing Part B of E-way bill under Rule 138 MPGST</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91100</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the levy of IGST and penalty for detention of goods due to non-generation of Part B of the E-way bill, despite the consignment being accompanied by a tax invoice with a Letter of Undertaking number, consignment note, and letter of credit. The court affirmed that under Rule 138 of the MPGST Rules, both Part A and Part B of FORM GST EWB-01 must be generated electronically before the movement of goods exceeding Rs. 50,000 in value. The absence of Part B invalidated the E-way bill, rendering the transportation unauthorized. The court held that generation of Part B is a mandatory statutory requirement to validate the movement, especially for export consignments. Consequently, the impugned order imposing tax and penalty was found proper, and the petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:18:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>