<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1875 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775807</link>
    <description>Gross delay of 471 days in filing the appeals was not satisfactorily explained, so condonation was refused. The appellant also could not dispute that the relied-upon order had already been challenged before the SC and that interference had been declined. The appeal was therefore dismissed both for delay of 305 days in filing the present appeal and on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:17:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1875 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775807</link>
      <description>Gross delay of 471 days in filing the appeals was not satisfactorily explained, so condonation was refused. The appellant also could not dispute that the relied-upon order had already been challenged before the SC and that interference had been declined. The appeal was therefore dismissed both for delay of 305 days in filing the present appeal and on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>