<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1870 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775802</link>
    <description>The HC held that cognizance under Section 223(1) of BNSS cannot be taken without first giving the accused an opportunity to be heard, as mandated by the first proviso. The Special Judge&#039;s order taking cognizance without such hearing was declared non est and set aside. The case was remitted to the pre-cognizance stage with directions to comply with the procedural requirement before proceeding further.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:17:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1870 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775802</link>
      <description>The HC held that cognizance under Section 223(1) of BNSS cannot be taken without first giving the accused an opportunity to be heard, as mandated by the first proviso. The Special Judge&#039;s order taking cognizance without such hearing was declared non est and set aside. The case was remitted to the pre-cognizance stage with directions to comply with the procedural requirement before proceeding further.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>