<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 67 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45459</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned, but only on a condition of payment of costs to the respondents within the stipulated time. The Court made non-compliance outcome-determinative: failure to pay the specified costs within 15 days would result in dismissal of the appeal with costs. The explanation offered for the delay was inadequate staffing in the Central Agency Section, and the Court treated that circumstance as the factual basis for exercising discretion while noting the need for improved service conditions there.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:19:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 67 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45459</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned, but only on a condition of payment of costs to the respondents within the stipulated time. The Court made non-compliance outcome-determinative: failure to pay the specified costs within 15 days would result in dismissal of the appeal with costs. The explanation offered for the delay was inadequate staffing in the Central Agency Section, and the Court treated that circumstance as the factual basis for exercising discretion while noting the need for improved service conditions there.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>