<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 95 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45458</link>
    <description>A fiscal concession under the Customs Act may not be denied to one importer where another similarly situated importer has received the same exemption and the Union offers no material justification for the distinction. The equal treatment principle applied because the public-interest basis for granting the concession to the other importer was not explained or rebutted by counter-affidavit. On those facts, the importer was entitled to parity in customs duty treatment, including refund of any excess duty paid, and the differential treatment was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:17:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 95 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45458</link>
      <description>A fiscal concession under the Customs Act may not be denied to one importer where another similarly situated importer has received the same exemption and the Union offers no material justification for the distinction. The equal treatment principle applied because the public-interest basis for granting the concession to the other importer was not explained or rebutted by counter-affidavit. On those facts, the importer was entitled to parity in customs duty treatment, including refund of any excess duty paid, and the differential treatment was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>