<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1834 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775766</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the appeal and directed the CIT(A) to grant the claimed foreign tax credit after verifying Form No.67. The tribunal held that the requirement to file Form 67 with the return under Rule 128 is directory, not mandatory, and filing it before completion of assessment satisfies the condition for FTC. The tribunal applied the principle that Rule 128 implements the Act and is directory in nature, therefore denial of FTC for late filing of Form 67 was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 10:30:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1834 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775766</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the appeal and directed the CIT(A) to grant the claimed foreign tax credit after verifying Form No.67. The tribunal held that the requirement to file Form 67 with the return under Rule 128 is directory, not mandatory, and filing it before completion of assessment satisfies the condition for FTC. The tribunal applied the principle that Rule 128 implements the Act and is directory in nature, therefore denial of FTC for late filing of Form 67 was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>