<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1838 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775770</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi upheld the deletion of additions under section 69C relating to unaccounted purchases. The tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s estimation of 2% profit from undisclosed imports instead of 12%, noting payments were made directly by the buyers to suppliers. Consequently, the addition of unexplained investments amounting to Rs. 2,38,36,824 was rightly deleted by CIT(A). The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:17:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1838 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775770</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi upheld the deletion of additions under section 69C relating to unaccounted purchases. The tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s estimation of 2% profit from undisclosed imports instead of 12%, noting payments were made directly by the buyers to suppliers. Consequently, the addition of unexplained investments amounting to Rs. 2,38,36,824 was rightly deleted by CIT(A). The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>