<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1855 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775787</link>
    <description>The ITAT Patna held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) based on estimated gross profit on unaccounted sales, after rejection of books, cannot be sustained. The CIT(A) had reduced the addition from 8% to 4%, and substantial relief was granted in the quantum appeal. Relying on precedent, the tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, setting aside the penalty imposed by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:17:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1855 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775787</link>
      <description>The ITAT Patna held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) based on estimated gross profit on unaccounted sales, after rejection of books, cannot be sustained. The CIT(A) had reduced the addition from 8% to 4%, and substantial relief was granted in the quantum appeal. Relying on precedent, the tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, setting aside the penalty imposed by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>