<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1858 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775790</link>
    <description>A penalty notice under section 274 must specify whether the alleged default is concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income by striking off the inapplicable limb. A notice issued mechanically without identifying the exact charge reflects non-application of mind and is invalid. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) founded on such a defective notice cannot be sustained, so the consequential penalty order is unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:17:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1858 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775790</link>
      <description>A penalty notice under section 274 must specify whether the alleged default is concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income by striking off the inapplicable limb. A notice issued mechanically without identifying the exact charge reflects non-application of mind and is invalid. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) founded on such a defective notice cannot be sustained, so the consequential penalty order is unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>