https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775795 The HC rejected the petitioner's appeal as time-barred but acknowledged the petitioner's difficulty due to the absence of an Appellate Tribunal. Despite the petitioner's insufficient explanation for delay, the court remanded the matter to the appellate authority for consideration on merits, condoning the delay. The petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 5000 to the HC Legal Services Committee. The petition was disposed of by remand. en-us Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:17:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775795 The HC rejected the petitioner's appeal as time-barred but acknowledged the petitioner's difficulty due to the absence of an Appellate Tribunal. Despite the petitioner's insufficient explanation for delay, the court remanded the matter to the appellate authority for consideration on merits, condoning the delay. The petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 5000 to the HC Legal Services Committee. The petition was disposed of by remand. Case-Laws GST Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775795