<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Kerala High Court’s Transformative Stand on GST ITC Denials: A Detailed Analysis of Recent Judgments</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14902</link>
    <description>Kerala High Court rulings require officers to assess ITC claims on substantive compliance-tax invoices, receipt of goods/services, payment proofs and absence of collusion-permitting alternative documentary evidence where suppliers default or portal records mismatch, and directing contextual flexibility for short delays under Section 16(4) while preserving the statutory time limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 07:01:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 07:01:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Kerala High Court’s Transformative Stand on GST ITC Denials: A Detailed Analysis of Recent Judgments</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14902</link>
      <description>Kerala High Court rulings require officers to assess ITC claims on substantive compliance-tax invoices, receipt of goods/services, payment proofs and absence of collusion-permitting alternative documentary evidence where suppliers default or portal records mismatch, and directing contextual flexibility for short delays under Section 16(4) while preserving the statutory time limit.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 07:01:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>