https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463011 Condonation of a 273-day delay in filing the appeal was refused because the explanation was found to be inadequate. The Tribunal held that a general, cursory explanation without accounting for the delay in a detailed manner did not demonstrate sufficient diligence or alacrity in pursuing the legal remedy. It observed that the delay needed to be explained either day by day or through a composite explanation showing bona fide pursuit of the remedy. The condonation application was dismissed. en-us Fri, 30 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Jul 2025 06:51:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463011 Condonation of a 273-day delay in filing the appeal was refused because the explanation was found to be inadequate. The Tribunal held that a general, cursory explanation without accounting for the delay in a detailed manner did not demonstrate sufficient diligence or alacrity in pursuing the legal remedy. It observed that the delay needed to be explained either day by day or through a composite explanation showing bona fide pursuit of the remedy. The condonation application was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 30 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463011