<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1783 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463009</link>
    <description>The HC held that issuance of the SCN without considering the petitioner&#039;s submissions violated natural justice. The SCN pertained to levy of GST on licence fees for certain financial years, questioning if it fell within the scope of service. The court directed the respondents to file a counter affidavit within six weeks and listed the matter for further hearing. The petitioner was allowed to file a reply and participate in proceedings, but no final decision shall be taken by respondents until the next listing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 20:41:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1783 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463009</link>
      <description>The HC held that issuance of the SCN without considering the petitioner&#039;s submissions violated natural justice. The SCN pertained to levy of GST on licence fees for certain financial years, questioning if it fell within the scope of service. The court directed the respondents to file a counter affidavit within six weeks and listed the matter for further hearing. The petitioner was allowed to file a reply and participate in proceedings, but no final decision shall be taken by respondents until the next listing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>