<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45445</link>
    <description>Unconditional stay and waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35-F were considered in a dispute over duty demand on old and unserviceable rails treated as non-duty paid goods. The Court noted that similar interim relief had been granted in earlier matters on comparable facts and stressed consistency in interim orders. On the materials then available, it found that the petitioner&#039;s purchase of rails from the Railway Department did not justify denial of similar relief. The order directing deposit was quashed, and the petitioner was treated as entitled to unconditional stay and waiver of pre-deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:13:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45445</link>
      <description>Unconditional stay and waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35-F were considered in a dispute over duty demand on old and unserviceable rails treated as non-duty paid goods. The Court noted that similar interim relief had been granted in earlier matters on comparable facts and stressed consistency in interim orders. On the materials then available, it found that the petitioner&#039;s purchase of rails from the Railway Department did not justify denial of similar relief. The order directing deposit was quashed, and the petitioner was treated as entitled to unconditional stay and waiver of pre-deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>