<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SCN of multiple years under section 74</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120302</link>
    <description>Where a composite SCN attributes tax to the wrong financial year, the primary defence is factual mismatch: invoices relate to a different year than the SCN/DRC-01 indicates. Each financial year&#039;s liability must be assessed separately and a valid SCN for a year must be issued within that year&#039;s statutory limitation; absence of a year-wise breakup or pre-SCN intimation can render the demand for the omitted year void and time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 10:52:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 07:02:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SCN of multiple years under section 74</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120302</link>
      <description>Where a composite SCN attributes tax to the wrong financial year, the primary defence is factual mismatch: invoices relate to a different year than the SCN/DRC-01 indicates. Each financial year&#039;s liability must be assessed separately and a valid SCN for a year must be issued within that year&#039;s statutory limitation; absence of a year-wise breakup or pre-SCN intimation can render the demand for the omitted year void and time-barred.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 10:52:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>