<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 44 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45433</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the petitioners should avail the statutory remedy of appeal and directed the Tribunal to entertain the appeal without insisting on pre-deposit due to the petitioners&#039; precarious financial condition. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions and observations, emphasizing that the decision was made in the peculiar background of the case and should not be considered a precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:06:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 44 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45433</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the petitioners should avail the statutory remedy of appeal and directed the Tribunal to entertain the appeal without insisting on pre-deposit due to the petitioners&#039; precarious financial condition. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions and observations, emphasizing that the decision was made in the peculiar background of the case and should not be considered a precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>