https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45431 A writ petition challenging a central excise show cause notice was held premature because the dispute involved a factual question whether the activity amounted to manufacture or only fabrication and erection of steel structures. The court noted that such issues should first be examined in the statutory adjudication process, especially where the excise law provided an appellate remedy and no final adverse order had yet been passed. On that basis, the writ remedy was found inappropriate at the notice stage and the petition was dismissed as not maintainable. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:03:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45431 A writ petition challenging a central excise show cause notice was held premature because the dispute involved a factual question whether the activity amounted to manufacture or only fabrication and erection of steel structures. The court noted that such issues should first be examined in the statutory adjudication process, especially where the excise law provided an appellate remedy and no final adverse order had yet been passed. On that basis, the writ remedy was found inappropriate at the notice stage and the petition was dismissed as not maintainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45431