<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1789 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775721</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, upholding the HC&#039;s classification of the roasted areca nuts as non-prohibited goods under Chapter 20 of the Tariff. The HC&#039;s finding that areca nuts with moisture content below 10% qualify as roasted nuts was affirmed, supported by laboratory reports. There was no error in the HC&#039;s decision, and the impugned order stands confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 08:21:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1789 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775721</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, upholding the HC&#039;s classification of the roasted areca nuts as non-prohibited goods under Chapter 20 of the Tariff. The HC&#039;s finding that areca nuts with moisture content below 10% qualify as roasted nuts was affirmed, supported by laboratory reports. There was no error in the HC&#039;s decision, and the impugned order stands confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>