https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45425 The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution, challenging an order related to excise duty determination. The Court held that bypassing the statutory appeal process to the Supreme Court was impermissible, citing a previous Division Bench decision and a Full Bench ruling of the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner was directed to pursue the available remedy of filing an appeal under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act. en-us Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:54:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45425 The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution, challenging an order related to excise duty determination. The Court held that bypassing the statutory appeal process to the Supreme Court was impermissible, citing a previous Division Bench decision and a Full Bench ruling of the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner was directed to pursue the available remedy of filing an appeal under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45425