<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1816 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775748</link>
    <description>HC held that absence of DIN on the assessment order affects its validity and must be addressed. The issue was not considered in the impugned ITAT orders, which were therefore quashed and set aside. ITAT was directed to rehear all appeals afresh, allowing parties to submit additional evidence and arguments, as ITAT is the final fact-finding authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 08:21:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1816 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775748</link>
      <description>HC held that absence of DIN on the assessment order affects its validity and must be addressed. The issue was not considered in the impugned ITAT orders, which were therefore quashed and set aside. ITAT was directed to rehear all appeals afresh, allowing parties to submit additional evidence and arguments, as ITAT is the final fact-finding authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>