https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775757 The SC held that the petition was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy through a statutory appeal. The petitioners, accused of evading GST by issuing bogus invoices to non-existent or non-operational firms, were denied the opportunity for cross-examination, violating natural justice principles. The HC directed the petitioners to file their appeal within 30 days with the requisite pre-deposit, assuring that the appeal would be heard on merits and not dismissed on limitation grounds. The SC disposed of the Special Leave Petition accordingly. en-us Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Jul 2025 12:52:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775757 The SC held that the petition was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy through a statutory appeal. The petitioners, accused of evading GST by issuing bogus invoices to non-existent or non-operational firms, were denied the opportunity for cross-examination, violating natural justice principles. The HC directed the petitioners to file their appeal within 30 days with the requisite pre-deposit, assuring that the appeal would be heard on merits and not dismissed on limitation grounds. The SC disposed of the Special Leave Petition accordingly. Case-Laws GST Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775757