https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45423 A preliminary objection to maintainability of a second revision against an interlocutory order was rejected because the challenge also covered a later CEGAT order arising from the same transaction. The Court then held that departmental findings accepting the alleged transfer of the vessel did not justify quashing a Customs Act prosecution, since the petitioner's own statement and surrounding circumstances created prima facie suspicion about the genuineness of the claimed sale. The complaint was therefore not liable to be quashed, and the criminal trial was directed to continue expeditiously. en-us Fri, 06 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:52:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45423 A preliminary objection to maintainability of a second revision against an interlocutory order was rejected because the challenge also covered a later CEGAT order arising from the same transaction. The Court then held that departmental findings accepting the alleged transfer of the vessel did not justify quashing a Customs Act prosecution, since the petitioner's own statement and surrounding circumstances created prima facie suspicion about the genuineness of the claimed sale. The complaint was therefore not liable to be quashed, and the criminal trial was directed to continue expeditiously. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 06 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45423