https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462973 Section 9(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was construed purposively: constitution of the arbitral tribunal means its assumption of jurisdiction on commencement of arbitral proceedings, not merely appointment of an arbitrator. On that basis, a pending Section 37 appeal was held maintainable and the objection based on Section 9(3) was rejected. On interim protection, the contract and escrow clauses did not require all receipts to be routed into escrow after termination of the master service agreement, but the respondents' statements and prior email provided a prima facie basis for a limited protective order. The respondents were directed to deposit future contract receipts into escrow, subject to further orders of the tribunal or the award. en-us Thu, 03 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Jul 2025 20:09:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462973 Section 9(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was construed purposively: constitution of the arbitral tribunal means its assumption of jurisdiction on commencement of arbitral proceedings, not merely appointment of an arbitrator. On that basis, a pending Section 37 appeal was held maintainable and the objection based on Section 9(3) was rejected. On interim protection, the contract and escrow clauses did not require all receipts to be routed into escrow after termination of the master service agreement, but the respondents' statements and prior email provided a prima facie basis for a limited protective order. The respondents were directed to deposit future contract receipts into escrow, subject to further orders of the tribunal or the award. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462973