https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45422 An order appealable to the Tribunal under the Central Excise Act could not be challenged by writ when an efficacious statutory remedy existed. The High Court held that the petitioner should have pursued the appellate route, including a request for reconsideration or reference to a Larger Bench if necessary. A Board circular did not bind the appellate authority so as to prevent the Tribunal from taking its own view, and a request to declare another Tribunal decision incorrect was misconceived. The writ petition was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed. en-us Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:50:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45422 An order appealable to the Tribunal under the Central Excise Act could not be challenged by writ when an efficacious statutory remedy existed. The High Court held that the petitioner should have pursued the appellate route, including a request for reconsideration or reference to a Larger Bench if necessary. A Board circular did not bind the appellate authority so as to prevent the Tribunal from taking its own view, and a request to declare another Tribunal decision incorrect was misconceived. The writ petition was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45422