https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462977 NCLAT directed the adjudicating tribunal seized of I.A. No. 837 of 2024, concerning withdrawal of the CIRP under Regulation 30A(2)(a) (furnishing a bank guarantee or payment towards CIRP costs), to decide the application as early as possible, preferably within one week. The appellate bench emphasized it made no observations on the merits and required the tribunal to independently adjudicate the pending application. Petition disposed. en-us Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Oct 2025 15:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462977 NCLAT directed the adjudicating tribunal seized of I.A. No. 837 of 2024, concerning withdrawal of the CIRP under Regulation 30A(2)(a) (furnishing a bank guarantee or payment towards CIRP costs), to decide the application as early as possible, preferably within one week. The appellate bench emphasized it made no observations on the merits and required the tribunal to independently adjudicate the pending application. Petition disposed. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462977