<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1666 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462986</link>
    <description>Amounts received for administrative support services required fresh factual examination to determine whether they constituted fees for technical services or fees for included services under the applicable treaty. The Tribunal found the agreement only broadly described the services and the record was insufficient to identify the actual year-specific nature of the work, including whether it was managerial, technical, consultancy, or a combination, and whether the treaty make available requirement was satisfied. Because the factual foundation was incomplete and supporting material such as emails and related details was still needed, the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 10:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1666 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462986</link>
      <description>Amounts received for administrative support services required fresh factual examination to determine whether they constituted fees for technical services or fees for included services under the applicable treaty. The Tribunal found the agreement only broadly described the services and the record was insufficient to identify the actual year-specific nature of the work, including whether it was managerial, technical, consultancy, or a combination, and whether the treaty make available requirement was satisfied. Because the factual foundation was incomplete and supporting material such as emails and related details was still needed, the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>