<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1690 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462987</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that the penalty notice issued under section 271AAB(1A) was defective and invalid due to the absence of specific charges and failure to mention the conditions under the section. The AO&#039;s notice was found to have a fatal error, rendering it not legally valid. Relying on precedent, the tribunal quashed the penalty proceedings and deleted the impugned penalty. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed on the ground of invalidity of the penalty notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 20:09:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1690 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462987</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that the penalty notice issued under section 271AAB(1A) was defective and invalid due to the absence of specific charges and failure to mention the conditions under the section. The AO&#039;s notice was found to have a fatal error, rendering it not legally valid. Relying on precedent, the tribunal quashed the penalty proceedings and deleted the impugned penalty. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed on the ground of invalidity of the penalty notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>