https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45408 Territorial nexus existed because searches were conducted within the Court's jurisdiction and the detention order was likely to be executed there, so the writ was entertainable under Article 226. A preventive detention order could also be challenged before execution where it is alleged to rest on vague, extraneous, irrelevant, non-existent or incompetent grounds, and the petitioner need not first surrender to an order vulnerable on its face. Applying COFEPOSA, the Court found the detention lacked the required preventive satisfaction, as the material showed pending adjudication and criminal proceedings, a claimed lawful source of foreign currency, and an order passed with undue haste without proper application of mind. The detention order was quashed, while the criminal complaint and adjudication proceedings remained unaffected. en-us Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:25:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45408 Territorial nexus existed because searches were conducted within the Court's jurisdiction and the detention order was likely to be executed there, so the writ was entertainable under Article 226. A preventive detention order could also be challenged before execution where it is alleged to rest on vague, extraneous, irrelevant, non-existent or incompetent grounds, and the petitioner need not first surrender to an order vulnerable on its face. Applying COFEPOSA, the Court found the detention lacked the required preventive satisfaction, as the material showed pending adjudication and criminal proceedings, a claimed lawful source of foreign currency, and an order passed with undue haste without proper application of mind. The detention order was quashed, while the criminal complaint and adjudication proceedings remained unaffected. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45408