<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1721 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775653</link>
    <description>The NCLAT upheld the dismissal of the Section 9 IBC petition on grounds of limitation and existence of a pre-existing dispute. The tribunal found the default date as 01.05.2016, with the limitation period expiring on 30.04.2019. The alleged settlement dated 13.06.2019 was unauthenticated and beyond the limitation period. Evidence including ongoing arbitration, disputed trade bills in the corporate debtor&#039;s annual report, and a default status marked as disputed in NeSL records confirmed the pre-existing dispute. The appellant&#039;s admission and documentary evidence supported the tribunal&#039;s findings. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1721 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775653</link>
      <description>The NCLAT upheld the dismissal of the Section 9 IBC petition on grounds of limitation and existence of a pre-existing dispute. The tribunal found the default date as 01.05.2016, with the limitation period expiring on 30.04.2019. The alleged settlement dated 13.06.2019 was unauthenticated and beyond the limitation period. Evidence including ongoing arbitration, disputed trade bills in the corporate debtor&#039;s annual report, and a default status marked as disputed in NeSL records confirmed the pre-existing dispute. The appellant&#039;s admission and documentary evidence supported the tribunal&#039;s findings. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>