<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1725 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775657</link>
    <description>A composite export consignment of iron ore fines with a limited lump component could not be artificially split for higher customs duty where the dominant character remained fines and the contractual tolerance formed part of the commercial arrangement. The declared export transaction value also could not be rejected merely on contemporaneous export prices, because the price was contractually negotiated, supported by invoices and bank realisation, and the compared exports were not shown to be truly comparable under the valuation rules. In the absence of a lawful basis to discard the declared price, re-determination of FOB value was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1725 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775657</link>
      <description>A composite export consignment of iron ore fines with a limited lump component could not be artificially split for higher customs duty where the dominant character remained fines and the contractual tolerance formed part of the commercial arrangement. The declared export transaction value also could not be rejected merely on contemporaneous export prices, because the price was contractually negotiated, supported by invoices and bank realisation, and the compared exports were not shown to be truly comparable under the valuation rules. In the absence of a lawful basis to discard the declared price, re-determination of FOB value was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>