<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1732 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775664</link>
    <description>Delayed filing of Form 10-IE was held to be directory rather than mandatory for opting into the new tax regime under section 115BAC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so the assessee&#039;s substantive entitlement was not lost merely because the form was filed after the prescribed due date. The matter was left for the Assessing Officer to verify the relevant facts and complete consequential computation accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1732 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775664</link>
      <description>Delayed filing of Form 10-IE was held to be directory rather than mandatory for opting into the new tax regime under section 115BAC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so the assessee&#039;s substantive entitlement was not lost merely because the form was filed after the prescribed due date. The matter was left for the Assessing Officer to verify the relevant facts and complete consequential computation accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>