https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45401 Cancellation of earlier Modvat credit permission by the same authority was treated as unsustainable because no express statutory power of review was shown, and such review jurisdiction cannot be assumed. The impugned cancellation was therefore described as without jurisdiction and patently illegal. Availability of an alternative appellate remedy was not treated as an absolute bar to writ relief where the challenged action was jurisdictionally defective. On that basis, the writ petition succeeded and the cancellation order was set aside. en-us Thu, 03 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:14:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45401 Cancellation of earlier Modvat credit permission by the same authority was treated as unsustainable because no express statutory power of review was shown, and such review jurisdiction cannot be assumed. The impugned cancellation was therefore described as without jurisdiction and patently illegal. Availability of an alternative appellate remedy was not treated as an absolute bar to writ relief where the challenged action was jurisdictionally defective. On that basis, the writ petition succeeded and the cancellation order was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45401