<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1736 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775668</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that the assessing officer exceeded the scope of limited scrutiny by making additions as unexplained cash credits under sections 68/69A, which were not part of the reasons for limited scrutiny. The additions were deleted by the lower appellate authority. The tribunal relied on Calcutta HC precedent confirming that additions beyond the specified issues in limited scrutiny assessments are beyond the AO&#039;s jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1736 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775668</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that the assessing officer exceeded the scope of limited scrutiny by making additions as unexplained cash credits under sections 68/69A, which were not part of the reasons for limited scrutiny. The additions were deleted by the lower appellate authority. The tribunal relied on Calcutta HC precedent confirming that additions beyond the specified issues in limited scrutiny assessments are beyond the AO&#039;s jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>