<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1761 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775693</link>
    <description>The HC held that since the petitioner complied with Circular No. 224/18/2024 GST dated 11th July 2024 by depositing 10% of the demanded amount, the recovery proceedings initiated without constitution of the GST Appellate Tribunal under Section 107(6) of the CGST Act were invalid. Consequently, the recovery notices dated 28th February 2025, 19th March 2025, and 25th March 2025 were set aside. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 08:30:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1761 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775693</link>
      <description>The HC held that since the petitioner complied with Circular No. 224/18/2024 GST dated 11th July 2024 by depositing 10% of the demanded amount, the recovery proceedings initiated without constitution of the GST Appellate Tribunal under Section 107(6) of the CGST Act were invalid. Consequently, the recovery notices dated 28th February 2025, 19th March 2025, and 25th March 2025 were set aside. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>