<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1781 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462965</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai held that the excess of stamp duty value over the purchase consideration, being less than 10% of the consideration, does not attract the provisions of section 56(2)(x)(b) of the Act. The tribunal applied the amendment increasing the tolerance threshold from 5% to 10% retrospectively, following precedents from ITAT Kolkata and Mumbai. Consequently, the addition under section 56(2)(x) was disallowed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 18:57:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1781 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462965</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai held that the excess of stamp duty value over the purchase consideration, being less than 10% of the consideration, does not attract the provisions of section 56(2)(x)(b) of the Act. The tribunal applied the amendment increasing the tolerance threshold from 5% to 10% retrospectively, following precedents from ITAT Kolkata and Mumbai. Consequently, the addition under section 56(2)(x) was disallowed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>