https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45382 The court dismissed the writ petitions, emphasizing that authorities must refrain from using third-degree methods during interrogations. It stated that the investigating agency has the discretion to determine the venue, timings, and manner of questioning. The court highlighted that the petitioner's request for his Advocate to be present during interrogation was denied, as it could obstruct the investigative process. Overall, the court underscored the importance of adhering to legal boundaries and safeguarding the petitioner's rights. en-us Thu, 11 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jul 2010 12:41:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45382 The court dismissed the writ petitions, emphasizing that authorities must refrain from using third-degree methods during interrogations. It stated that the investigating agency has the discretion to determine the venue, timings, and manner of questioning. The court highlighted that the petitioner's request for his Advocate to be present during interrogation was denied, as it could obstruct the investigative process. Overall, the court underscored the importance of adhering to legal boundaries and safeguarding the petitioner's rights. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 11 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45382