https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775567 The CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appellant's appeal, holding that service tax credit on various input services, including architect, interior decorator, photography, pandal & shamiana, mandap keeper, outdoor catering, works contract, and insurance auxiliary services, is admissible. The Tribunal relied on its prior decision in a similar case where credit was permitted and noted that the Department had allowed credit for the subsequent period. Consequently, there was no justification to deny credit for the intervening period under dispute. The appeal was allowed accordingly. en-us Fri, 11 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775567 The CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appellant's appeal, holding that service tax credit on various input services, including architect, interior decorator, photography, pandal & shamiana, mandap keeper, outdoor catering, works contract, and insurance auxiliary services, is admissible. The Tribunal relied on its prior decision in a similar case where credit was permitted and noted that the Department had allowed credit for the subsequent period. Consequently, there was no justification to deny credit for the intervening period under dispute. The appeal was allowed accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775567