https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775570 CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal, holding that Cenvat credit cannot be denied solely because the party produced a challan not specified under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal noted that the issue of admissibility of alternative documents for credit is settled in favor of the assessee. The department's suspicion regarding the party's conduct at the Customs port does not justify disallowance of credit under excise law when the correctness of transactions is not disputed. en-us Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775570 CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal, holding that Cenvat credit cannot be denied solely because the party produced a challan not specified under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal noted that the issue of admissibility of alternative documents for credit is settled in favor of the assessee. The department's suspicion regarding the party's conduct at the Customs port does not justify disallowance of credit under excise law when the correctness of transactions is not disputed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775570