https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775571 The CESTAT AHMEDABAD held that the appellant's notional exclusion of 10% Cenvat Credit related to trading goods is not authorized under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, which require separate accounts and reversal of credit on exempted goods. The tribunal found the impugned order non-speaking and incomplete, as it failed to address key issues and case laws. The matter was remanded to the original authority for re-determination of the credit reversal and demand, ensuring proper application of Rule 6(3) and relevant provisions, with due consideration of records and interest. The appeal was allowed by remand. en-us Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775571 The CESTAT AHMEDABAD held that the appellant's notional exclusion of 10% Cenvat Credit related to trading goods is not authorized under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, which require separate accounts and reversal of credit on exempted goods. The tribunal found the impugned order non-speaking and incomplete, as it failed to address key issues and case laws. The matter was remanded to the original authority for re-determination of the credit reversal and demand, ensuring proper application of Rule 6(3) and relevant provisions, with due consideration of records and interest. The appeal was allowed by remand. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775571