<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1647 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775579</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was granted where the investigation had remained pending for a prolonged period, no prosecution complaint had yet been filed, and the material was largely documentary. The Court found that the applicant had not been called for investigation for a considerable time and that the circumstances supported protection of liberty pending further proceedings. It also held that the relevant bail factors did not justify custodial arrest, as there was no material showing a flight risk, tampering with evidence, or influencing of witnesses. Conditional pre-arrest protection was therefore ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:27:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1647 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775579</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was granted where the investigation had remained pending for a prolonged period, no prosecution complaint had yet been filed, and the material was largely documentary. The Court found that the applicant had not been called for investigation for a considerable time and that the circumstances supported protection of liberty pending further proceedings. It also held that the relevant bail factors did not justify custodial arrest, as there was no material showing a flight risk, tampering with evidence, or influencing of witnesses. Conditional pre-arrest protection was therefore ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>