<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1649 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775581</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition as withdrawn, clarifying that the petitioner cannot seek writ relief against the BCCI under Article 226 for indemnification related to penalties imposed under FEMA by the ED. The Court held that since the matter does not involve discharge of a public function, BCCI is not amenable to writ jurisdiction in this context. However, the petitioner remains entitled to pursue civil remedies available under law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1649 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775581</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition as withdrawn, clarifying that the petitioner cannot seek writ relief against the BCCI under Article 226 for indemnification related to penalties imposed under FEMA by the ED. The Court held that since the matter does not involve discharge of a public function, BCCI is not amenable to writ jurisdiction in this context. However, the petitioner remains entitled to pursue civil remedies available under law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>