https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775584 The HC held that the petition challenging the rejection of the refund scheme under RoDTEP was not maintainable as the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy under Section 128A of the Customs Act. Issues raised regarding precedent, legal interpretation, and limitation are to be addressed by the appellate authority first. The petition was filed within the limitation period for appeal, and the court directed the petitioner to file the appeal within two weeks. The appellate authority was instructed to decide the appeal on merits without raising limitation objections. The petition was disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775584 The HC held that the petition challenging the rejection of the refund scheme under RoDTEP was not maintainable as the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy under Section 128A of the Customs Act. Issues raised regarding precedent, legal interpretation, and limitation are to be addressed by the appellate authority first. The petition was filed within the limitation period for appeal, and the court directed the petitioner to file the appeal within two weeks. The appellate authority was instructed to decide the appeal on merits without raising limitation objections. The petition was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775584