<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 40 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45379</link>
    <description>A special appeal was barred where the Single Judge&#039;s Article 226 judgment concerned an interim order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in appellate proceedings under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Chapter VIII, Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules excludes special appeals from judgments rendered in appellate jurisdiction and from writ judgments relating to orders made by a Government officer or authority in appellate or revisional jurisdiction under a Central Act. The interim order on waiver of pre-deposit retained its appellate character despite the pending main appeal, so the writ petition fell within the Rule 5 exclusion and the special appeal was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 12:19:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 40 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45379</link>
      <description>A special appeal was barred where the Single Judge&#039;s Article 226 judgment concerned an interim order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in appellate proceedings under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Chapter VIII, Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules excludes special appeals from judgments rendered in appellate jurisdiction and from writ judgments relating to orders made by a Government officer or authority in appellate or revisional jurisdiction under a Central Act. The interim order on waiver of pre-deposit retained its appellate character despite the pending main appeal, so the writ petition fell within the Rule 5 exclusion and the special appeal was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>