<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1656 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775588</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai held that the addition under section 56(2)(x) regarding the difference between the agreement value and stamp duty value of the property was not applicable as the property was transferred by a relative of the assessee. Transactions between relatives are exempt from the provisions of section 56(2)(x). Relying on precedent, the tribunal deleted the addition made by the AO and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1656 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775588</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai held that the addition under section 56(2)(x) regarding the difference between the agreement value and stamp duty value of the property was not applicable as the property was transferred by a relative of the assessee. Transactions between relatives are exempt from the provisions of section 56(2)(x). Relying on precedent, the tribunal deleted the addition made by the AO and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>